Next actions
Review state patterns, then move into modules, methodology, and relationship context.
Guidance: How to validate local state context
← Medicaid hub · Intelligence dashboard · Methodology appendix
This tool does not predict payer actions. It highlights statistical variance patterns that may warrant clearer documentation.
Volume figures are aggregate counts, not individual claim predictions.
TX state intelligence
Understand Medicaid patterns in Texas
See pass-month coverage (65/84), policy watchpoints, and border code signals so teams can prioritize documentation work with context.
These metrics measure statistical consistency, not clinical appropriateness.
Share and export
Copy a tracked share link or export a quick markdown brief for internal circulation.
State: TXPass months: 65/84Policy events: 3High DQ signals: 6
Data quality coverage
77.4%
65/84 pass months
Aggregate paid volume
$56,225,437,510
From the current aggregate release.
Negative paid rate
0.0%
Monthly average context
Missing servicing NPI rate
19.5%
Reporting-behavior context
Data quality readiness tier
Guarded
Lower pass-month coverage means trend interpretation should stay observational-only.
Pass-month rate: 77.4% (65/84).
Documentation pressure tier
Elevated
Higher reversal and/or servicing-blank rates indicate stronger documentation-friction pressure.
Avg negative paid rate: 0.0% · Avg servicing blank rate: 19.5%.
Policy comparison tier
Guarded
Quality and control markers indicate higher sensitivity for policy-effect interpretation.
Event count: 3 · Quality warnings: 3.
Payer-mix context
This state currently falls in the medium dependency band.
The payer-mix profile includes 657 providers.
Total observed Medicaid paid is $3,712,044,567 across 48,352,287 claims.
The average observed span is 41.9 months.
Proxy from Medicaid-only billing intensity; non-Medicaid payer denominators are not observed.
Policy comparison context
This release tracks 3 policy events in this state.
The latest effective month is 2020-03.
Comparison quality rate is 100.0% .
Estimated payment change is -$6,385,106 .
The current release flags 3 quality warnings.
The latest QA status is N/A.
Top boundary differential code signals
These comparisons are sorted by highest average absolute paid-per-claim differential.
| Code | Avg abs paid/claim diff % | Max abs paid/claim diff % | Comparisons | Dominant inconsistency band | DQ sensitivity | Code pathway |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G8942 | 200.0% | 200.0% | 2 | High review priority | high | Open code profile |
| 3045F | 200.0% | 200.0% | 1 | High review priority | high | Open code profile |
| G0406 | 200.0% | 200.0% | 1 | High review priority | high | Open code profile |
| 97024 | 200.0% | 200.0% | 2 | Review recommended | high | Open code profile |
| G8979 | 198.7% | 200.0% | 8 | Review recommended | high | Open code profile |
| 90685 | 187.8% | 200.0% | 35 | High review priority | high | Open code profile |
Metadata and limitations
- The release data package was generated 2026-03-21T18:33:23.950Z.
- The state source mapping for this view is npi_map.
- Aggregate state-level context from T-MSIS provider-code-month inputs; no patient-level claims are present.
- Boundary differential values are proxy comparisons and do not represent bilateral 30-mile provider geolocation attribution.
- Observational DiD from aggregate state-month totals; policy causality not proven.
Explore or request a guided workflow
Explore Medicaid Intelligence now. If you want this mapped to your codes, state programs, or internal review workflows, request a guided session.
After you request a guided session, we send a short intake email and scheduling options within one business day.
Page updated: 2026-02-16