Skip to main content

Review hospital intelligence surfaces

This page combines transparency readiness, chargemaster-cost gap context, enforcement exposure, and segment opportunity proxies for hospital planning workflows.

How to read this page

Start with O14. Use it to see where transparency coverage is strongest or weakest.

Use O15 and O16 next. They show markup context and enforcement pressure, not payer decisions.

Treat O17 as a proxy. Sparse or clustered points reflect limited segment coverage, not a broken chart.

States represented: 56 Matched hospitals: 100 Opportunity segments: 2

Source snapshot: cms.hospital-mrf-urls.v1@2026-04-06T16:52:31.741Z · Schema: intelligence.hospitals.transparency-score.v1

O14 · Transparency Completeness Score

State-level view combining MRF publication status, cost report presence, and enforcement context.

Observed support Coverage 100.00% Join success 100.00%

Transparency completeness scoring has full support across tracked state-level hospital records.

Support: 7,195 of 7,195 entities met support thresholds.

Snapshot cms.hospital-mrf-urls.v1@2026-04-06T16:52:31.741Z · Schema intelligence.hospitals.transparency-score.v1 · Generated 4/6/2026

State-level transparency readiness from published MRF links, cost report availability, and enforcement context.

  • Hospital must have state assignment in baseline MRF index
  • Coverage and score fields must resolve deterministically
  • State aggregates are contextual and do not score individual facilities for compliance outcomes.
  • Coverage depends on source index completeness and update timing.

Composition by category

Stacked horizontal bar chart showing Hospitals with published URL and Hospitals missing URL by category.
  • 12 categories shown with stacked values for Hospitals with published URL and Hospitals missing URL.
  • FL has the highest combined total at 292.
Hospitals with published URL and Hospitals missing URL stacked share table
CategoryHospitals with published URLHospitals missing URLTotal
PA22159280
UT432164
AL7943122
WI10159160
NC8654140
FL186106292
MD622385
SC613596
ID322254
AR7247119
GA11772189
HI191231

O15 · Cost vs Chargemaster Gap View

Facility-level spread between chargemaster markup context and cost-to-charge financial structure.

Derived support Coverage 84.63% Join success 84.63%

Cost-to-chargemaster gap view is derived context where complete payer dimensions are unavailable.

Support: 5,132 of 6,064 entities met support thresholds.

Snapshot cms.hospital-cost-reports.v1@2026-04-06T16:52:50.525Z · Schema intelligence.hospitals.cost-chargemaster-gap.v1 · Generated 4/6/2026

Hospital-level spread between chargemaster markup context and reported cost-to-charge structure.

  • Facility must have both cost-report and chargemaster context
  • Rows failing join criteria are excluded and tracked in support metrics
  • This is aggregate financial context and does not represent payer-specific contract terms.
  • Gap scores are directional signals and require facility-level validation.

Distribution + intensity

Bubble size represents weighted context volume.

Bubble chart plotting Cost-to-charge ratio (%) against Median markup (%) for 40 points. Bubble size represents weighted context volume.
  • 40 bubble points shown.
  • New York-Presbyterian Hospital has the highest cost-to-charge ratio (%) at 22.68.
  • Cjw Medical Center has the highest median markup (%) at 1,769.86.
Cost-to-charge ratio (%) and Median markup (%) bubble chart table
LabelCost-to-charge ratio (%)Median markup (%)Bubble size
Cjw Medical Center6.361,769.866
Hca Florida North Florida Hospital6.251,380.016
Upmc Presbyterian Shadyside8.951,274.416
Hca Florida Ocala Hospital6.751,177.776
Methodist Hospital9.491,084.856
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center11.411,030.556
St Luke's Hospital Bethlehem9.85915.016
Orlando Health Orlando Regional Medical Center12.63915.756
Lehigh Valley Hospital13.35776.456
Tampa General Hospital15.24751.036
Houston Methodist Hospital15.71704.876
Adventhealth Orlando15.63700.496
Hospital Of Univ Of Pennsylvania14.14674.846
Stanford Health Care14.03664.216
North Shore University Hospital19.59667.186
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital18.73653.496
Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Inc17.71651.696
Gulf Coast Medical Center Lee Mem Health System18.06628.026
Wellstar Kennestone Regional Medical Center14.92617.576
Sarasota Memorial Hospital16.94603.36
University Of Colorado Hospital Authority14.59600.446
Nyu Langone Hospitals15.6594.096
Baptist Medical Center Jacksonville18.08586.536
Long Island Jewish Medical Center19.31587.36
St Francis Hospital, Roslyn16582.816
Saint Francis Medical Center17.99575.36
Huntsville Hospital18.27570.786
Montefiore Medical Center17.38569.856
Norton Hospital / Norton Healthcare Pavilion / Nor21.85563.236
Cleveland Clinic Martin North Hospital15.96542.886
University Of Alabama Hospital19.76544.886
Vanderbilt University Medical Center21.53546.16
Toledo Hospital The17.39530.576
Memorial Mission Hospital And Asheville Surgery Ce19.03531.666
University Of California Davis Medical Center22.39531.136
The University Of Chicago Medical Center18.65526.886
Morristown Medical Center19.54525.326
Northwestern Memorial Hospital16.91513.836
New York-Presbyterian Hospital22.68508.56
Baptist Memorial Hospital18.82503.456

Click a bubble to open the facility profile. If chart interaction is limited in your browser, use one of the direct links below.

O16 · Enforcement Exposure Tracker

State exposure score where enforcement actions and low MRF publication overlap.

Observed support Coverage 100.00% Join success 100.00%

Enforcement exposure has full support for tracked states with deterministic scoring inputs.

Support: 8,531 of 8,531 entities met support thresholds.

Snapshot cms.price-transparency-enforcement.v1@2026-04-06T16:52:55.611Z · Schema intelligence.hospitals.enforcement-exposure.v1 · Generated 4/6/2026

State-level enforcement intensity combined with MRF availability to estimate transparency exposure pressure.

  • Enforcement rows require valid state and action metadata
  • State exposure score must include publication-coverage context
  • Exposure score is directional planning context, not a legal determination.
  • Enforcement activity timing and publication status may update asynchronously.

Compare two measures

Horizontal bar chart comparing All actions and Recent actions across 12 categories.
  • 12 categories compared across All actions and Recent actions.
  • FL has the highest all actions at 655.
  • FL has the highest recent actions at 577.
All actions and Recent actions comparison table
CategoryAll actionsRecent actions
NV210171
DE5041
DC4330
NJ235185
VT3732
NH7848
FL655577
VI33
CO204189
NC271247
MA188168
MI323313

O17 · Payer Opportunity Matrix (Proxy)

Segment-level opportunity proxy using markup and operating margin context where payer dimensions are unavailable.

This chart is rendering a very small number of segment bubbles right now. The empty space reflects low data density in the current public proxy, not a failed load.
Derived support Coverage 78.50% Join success 78.49%

Opportunity matrix is derived from proxy segment scoring where direct payer dimensions are incomplete.

Support: 4,760 of 6,064 entities met support thresholds.

Snapshot cms.hospital-cost-reports.v1@2026-04-06T16:52:50.525Z · Schema intelligence.hospitals.payer-opportunity-matrix.v1 · Generated 4/6/2026

Segment-level opportunity proxy across hospital control/provider groups using markup and operating-margin context.

  • Segment rows require markup and operating-margin context
  • Use as sequencing input, not payer-level conclusion
  • Payer dimensions are not present; this is a segment proxy and not payer-specific strategy output.
  • Opportunity bands are heuristic and require local contract validation.

Distribution + intensity

Bubble size represents weighted context volume.

Bubble chart plotting Median operating margin (%) against Median markup (%) for 2 points. Bubble size represents weighted context volume.
  • 2 bubble points shown.
  • Control 2 · Provider 1 has the highest median operating margin (%) at -5.88.
  • Control 2 · Provider 1 has the highest median markup (%) at 414.79.
Median operating margin (%) and Median markup (%) bubble chart table
LabelMedian operating margin (%)Median markup (%)Bubble size
Control 2 · Provider 1-5.88414.7933.5
Control 10 · Provider 1-7.17366.665.5

Have a medical bill?

Upload it and check line items against Medicare benchmarks, NCCI bundling rules, and pricing data.

Open Bill Analyzer

Boundary

State-level transparency readiness from published MRF links, cost report availability, and enforcement context.

Supports state-prioritized hospital transparency reviews before deep facility-level investigation.

  • State aggregates are contextual and do not score individual facilities for compliance outcomes.
  • Coverage depends on source index completeness and update timing.